[nmh]

You really are blind.

The evidence doesn't support evolution. There has not been one fossil to indicate a "transition". Not one.
Hey, if you want to believe you are a decent of s primitive ape - that's your business. Need I also mention the fatally flawed dating methods - it's like out come based education - through your flawed methods you have predetermined the outcome - which still makes evolution laughably false!

What I find even more amusing is the very "laws of science" you claim to worship utterly defy that evolution is a possibility. Evolutionary hypothesis utterly defy these very laws. It takes a hell of a leap of FAITH to buy into evolution. But you know what? You can also believe there are little green men on the moon too! It really doesn't phase me. Truth is your worst enemy.

[Coyoteman]

There has not been one fossil to indicate a "transition". Not one.

See post #78.

[Philistone]

Uhm...

How could one fossil indicate a transition?

Wouldn't you need at least two?

Or do you mean "one fossil" that is exactly between two others?

Your point doesn't make any sense.

[shuckmaster]

There has not been one fossil to indicate a "transition". Not one.