Posted on 01/14/2006 5:04:46 PM PST by cgk
Simply code, any Jewobsessive posting here picked it up immediately.
"Thank You for taking them under your wing...and showing them the truth about firearms. I've had this dicussion on more than one occassion with Jewish friends who are virulently anti-gun. I just don't understand how they can be anti-self-defense....after all that history"
Don't debate them and tell them why they]'re wrong - take them to the range (with appropriate eye and ear protection) and let them see for themselves why they hate guns. Odds are they'll go and buy one later.
"This is Old Testament. New Testament says "He who rejects Me also rejects the one who sent me." and this little gem: "Whosoever rejects me in front of men, so shall I reject Him on the day of Judgement in the Father's presence"."
The Jewish view is that man doesn't need any intercession between God and Man. Also, we aren't going to take the word of some "apostle" that the "eternal covenant" isn't.
Replacement theology - one of the ideological basis of anti-semitism - rears it's head on a thread about the same subject. Nice!
It's not so odd -- the Jews chose G-D.
" Right on. I'm so sick of this Jewish Supremacist garbage. Does any Gentile really think about how atrociously arrogant the belief that the Jews are God's chosen is? That means anyone who is not a Jew (Gentiles) are not God's chosen ones. If the Gentiles are not God's chosen, what is their status? Soulless trash? Useful idiots?"
It's a burden, not a privilige.
"If the Gentiles are not God's chosen, what is their status? Soulless trash? Useful idiots?"
That is inflammatory, accusatory, misguided, mean, and plain wrong. Do you really think that's how Jews see others?
Ha! Go, Jews!!!
"Ony Jews are humans. Gentiles are animals." - Talmud, Soncino Edition, 1935 - Baba Mezla 114a-114b
Deliberate mistranslation. Please don't go repeating this stuff, you'll only make yourself look like a dumb as a box of rocks stormfront type.
Responses from http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Cyprus/8815/qts.html
RESPONSE (1) This represents a lack of knowledge of Hebrew at a most fundamental level. Here, the anti-Semites claim that Adam means human but it really means man. "Yetsoor" is the Hebrew word for human. Jews are referred to by the singular form of man, Adam, whilst non-Jews are referred to by the plural form of man, or anasheem. Both forms of the word mean human, but one is single, the other is plural. The reason that Jews are referred to in the singular is that if one Jew does something bad, or is alleged to have, all Jews are blamed for it. So, for the wrongdoing or alleged wrongdoing of one, all suffer. In the case of non-Jews, only individuals suffer, not all of the non-Jews. So that is why Jews are referred to as a single person and non-Jews are referred to in the plural. David S. Maddison (maddison@connexus.net.au)
RESPONSE (2) (Also, see other responses elswhere.) Apparently a deliberate mistranslation. The passage deals with the technical rules of corpse-impurity which, according to the author of this text, apply to Jews and not to gentiles. In this connection Ezekiel 34:31 is cited: "And ye My sheep [referring to Israel], the sheep of My pasture, are _men [Hebrew: "adam"]_, and I am your God, saith the Lord God." From a careful midrashic reading of this Biblical verse, Rabbi Simeon ben Yohai deduced "Only "ye" [i.e., Israel, not other nations] are designated "adam," in the sense that only Jewish corpses and graves generate impurity according to Numbers 19:14: "This is the law: when a _man ['adam']_ dieth in a tent, every one that cometh into the tent...shall be unclean seven days..." The passage is legal and exegetical, not theological. If anything, it seems to put Jews on a lower footing than non-Jews. Typically, the words "but beasts" were added on by whoever put this list together. They do not appear in the original. Correspondent of catamont@concentric.net (Sara Salzman) catamont-2305980759150001@ts003d13.den-co.concentric.net
CLAIM "The Jews are called human beings, but the non-Jews are not humans. They are beasts." Talmud: Baba mezia, 114b
RESPONSE (1)
This represents a lack of knowledge of Hebrew at a most fundamental level. Here, the anti-Semites claim that Adam means human but it really means man. "Yetsoor" is the Hebrew word for human. Jews are referred to by the singular form of man, Adam, whilst non-Jews are referred to by the plural form of man, or anasheem. Both forms of the word mean human, but one is single, the other is plural. The reason that Jews are referred to in the singular is that if one Jew does something bad, or is alleged to have, all Jews are blamed for it. So, for the wrongdoing or alleged wrongdoing of one, all suffer. In the case of non-Jews, only individuals suffer, not all of the non-Jews. So that is why Jews are referred to as a single person and non-Jews are referred to in the plural.
RESPONSE (2)
(Also, see other responses elswhere.)
Apparently a deliberate mistranslation. The passage deals with the technical rules of corpse-impurity which, according to the author of this text, apply to Jews and not to gentiles. In this connection Ezekiel 34:31 is cited: "And ye My sheep [referring to Israel], the sheep of My pasture, are _men [Hebrew: "adam"]_, and I am your God, saith the Lord God." From a careful midrashic reading of this Biblical verse, Rabbi Simeon ben Yohai deduced "Only "ye" [i.e., Israel, not other nations] are designated "adam," in the sense that only Jewish corpses and graves generate impurity according to Numbers 19:14: "This is the law: when a _man ['adam']_ dieth in a tent, every one that cometh into the tent...shall be unclean seven days..." The passage is legal and exegetical, not theological. If anything, it seems to put Jews on a lower footing than non-Jews. Typically, the words "but beasts" were added on by whoever put this list together. They do not appear in the original.
GMTA! :)
Very nice.
Very nice.
Great article and from the LA Times!
Excellent commentary! Thanks for posting this. Methinks therein lies much truth.
Click on links in post 84.
I clicked on the links and googled - see no reference to palestians with respect to the ollywood Presbyterian Church. Disagreement appears to be style of service and $800,000+ church deficit - what am I missing?
Readings from the Koran and prayers to Allah by the Prebytery officials don't give you a hint?
"Palestine is the wrong name for their State. It should be called Anarchy."—FReeper sgtbono2002
"Then let's wait and see what the Arabs do after they take Gaza. There's nothing like Arab reality to break up a Jewish fantasy."—FReeper Noachian
A student told his professor he was going to "Palestine" to "fight for freedom, peace and justice,"—Orwellian leftist code words that mean "murder Jews."
The Nature Of Bruce ~
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.