Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: starfish923
I'm not sure that polygamy will be the first problem that comes from legal queer marriage in this country.

I think their next step will be father/son, mother/daughter marriage.

What basis would their be to stop them if queer marriage is made legal?

They couldn't produce children so the recessive gene argument would go out the window.

Queer marriage has opened Pandora's box and if it isn't stopped soon I don't know where it will end.
25 posted on 01/14/2006 7:36:44 AM PST by Beagle8U (An "Earth First" kinda guy ( when we finish logging here, we'll start on the other planets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Beagle8U
I'm not sure that polygamy will be the first problem that comes from legal queer marriage in this country. I think their next step will be father/son, mother/daughter marriage. What basis would their be to stop them if queer marriage is made legal? They couldn't produce children so the recessive gene argument would go out the window. Queer marriage has opened Pandora's box and if it isn't stopped soon I don't know where it will end.

The same-sex marriage will open Pandora's box in the following ways:

1. Polygamous marriages, so Muslims will have the right to have wives. They can only have four, unlike the Mormon polygamy which had MANY. Also, the ONLY Muslims who have more than one wife are EXTREMELY wealthy men and royalty (and that is often obligatory, whether they like their cousins or not).
We would see Dutch marriages proliferate. Who CARES what sexuality the women are? They're all boinking together. I BET there always drugs/alcohol involved. Who could LOOK at that piece of fat/bald shit and boink it stone, cold sober? Ugh.

2. Vice-versa. That won't be the gift women think it might be. They would have to "take care of" more than one husband. Think of the picking up, clearing up, cleaning up, laundry, flatulence, cooking ("what's for dinner?" times four!)....and think, o gawd, think of the IN-LAWS to deal with. A woman would have MORE than one mother-in-law. The paychecks wouldn't make up for having to boink'em ALL.

3. Homosexual marriages with more than two people.

4. Multiple partner marriages.

5. THEN would start what is available in India -- that is, CHILDREN marriages, or 11-12 years olds getting married to each other or to older spouses.

The Farsis (southern India immigrants from Persia hundreds of years ago) are the only ones that allow all marriages. Father-daughter, brother-sister, etc. But, even for them, mother-son marriages are out of the questions. Who knows why that remains.

It's all abyssmal selfishness, egotism, self-absorption and self-indulgence, with absolutely NO regard for children's needs.

42 posted on 01/14/2006 3:16:40 PM PST by starfish923 (Socrates: It's never right to do wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson