It seems strange that 6000 species of chimpanzie lived on this earth at one time but during this same time period, every dig unearths humanoids and not chimapanzees, Lucy for instance was proven by the french to be a chimpazee, but Americans still tout her as a human ancestor.
Christianity, to be fair here, has even less evidence, almost all of it is faith based, but then again so is evolution.
NO TRANSITIONAL speices exist. Period, you can lie about it, fake it, claim it, but in the end none exist.
Darwin himself had doubts about his theory and said that if the transitional species didn't turn up soon, then his theory was in the toliet, but of course Dariwnist insist that this theory is correct regardless of the evidence which suggest otherwise. Like christianity, evolution is not provable, unless of course you want to accept conjecture and false fossils as evidence.
So do the cheese-eating surrender monkeys
Certainly does seem strange, could you post a link or book title where the evidence is laid out?
Please study fig. 4.4.1
There's a law of nature here: If an ERV is in the same place in the genome of a person and a gorilla, it will also be found in the same place in the chimpanzee genome.
But wait, there's more!
If an ERV is found in one species of Old World monkey, and one species of New World monkey, it will be found in all species of ape, including ourselves.
Many similar laws can be read off the diagram.
Read the essay which the diagram is illustrating. Think about it really hard.
The claim isn't something like "96& of chimp DNA ...", it's that certain pieces of the genome are identical between species, and are always distributed among them in the way the diagram shows.
Wrong. All existing species are transitional. Period, you can lie about it, fake it, claim it, but in the end all existing species are transitional.