[Dimensio]

How many times would like a 10# brick released from 20 feet above your head? If you doubt the expected result, you would have no reason to move, would you?

No matter how many times it were done, it would not, in any way, explain why the brick falls in a regularly observed pattern. It would merely establish strong evidence that such a pattern exists. You have once again completely ducked the question of explaining why gravity occurs.

[RunningWolf]

The theory of gravity does not explain why either. The theory only describes the pieces of what can be measured.

Wolf

[connectthedots]

Your inane questioning as to why gravity exists caused me to consider an interesting question. Assuming macro-evolution and universal descent are true, an assumption I obviously disagree with, please explain what purpose is served and why would single cell organisms have a need to become more complex? Couldn't they simply continue to exist as single-celled organisms? If there was some sort of environmental condition existing that made it impossible for single-celled organisms to survive, why do they still exist? If survival did not require more than single-celled organisms, evolution serves no purpose.

I assume you go along with the relatively recent claim that evolution has nothing to say about the origin of life. Well, couldn't what/whoever that caused/created single-celled organisms also create/design organisms that are far more complex; including man?

After all, isn't it the evolutionist position that most life forms have a great deal in common. If there is so much in common, why couldn't what/whoever created single-celled life design/create man and everything in between that evolutionists claim happened over vast quantities of time.

As any rational person can see, this whole business about evolution having nothing to say about the origin of life creates its own problems for evolutionists.

[connectthedots]

did you realize just how close your screne name is to "dementia'? They have so many letters in common and in a very similar order, they must be related. after all, if it works for DNA as evolutionists claim, it must also be true for letters of the alphabet.