[From many - one.]

1. You omit Gen 1:22
2. You omit the fact that nowhere in Gen 2 is there a mention of what you are delimiting as waterfowl.

I see nothing on your interpretation that makes it appear more valid than mine.

[loboinok]

1. "You omit Gen 1:22"

What problem are you having with this?

2. "You omit the fact that nowhere in Gen 2 is there a mention of what you are delimiting as waterfowl."

The problem may be that one of us is not understanding the distinction between landfowl and waterfowl.