[connectthedots]

That's why burdens of proof are on people who advocate something. Otherwise all our time would be spent trying to disprove crank theories and we'd never have any time to work on plausible stuff.

The the 'proof' of evolution is? Evolutionists even admit that evolution is only a theory (it's actually a model). If it is, at best, a theory; there is no proof for evolution. Belief in evolution requires some degree of faith; doesn't it?

[Dimensio]

Evolutionists even admit that evolution is only a theory

You have been told time and again the significance of the term "theory" with respect to science, in that there is no label "higher" than "theory" for any scientific explanation. That you pull the "only a theory" line despite having told over and over again that a "theory" implies an explanation that has withstood rigourous testing and has amassed significant amounts of evidence demonstrates that you are fundamentally dishonest.

[jec41]

Evolutionists even admit that evolution is only a theory

A theory requires proof by definition. It is not a opinion.