[FairOpinion]

As I said, Republicans that those who win the Republican party nomination CANNOT WIN a state wide office in CA.

THAT was exactly my point, when I said that with the exception of Arnold, NO Republicans have been elected to a statewide office.

So the Republicans keep running ultraconservatives with zero charisma and they keep losing. Then they do it again and again.

"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. "
Albert Einstein

[fieldmarshaldj]

"So the Republicans keep running ultraconservatives with zero charisma and they keep losing. Then they do it again and again."

Who are these ultraconservatives, oh delusional one ? Oh, wait... you mean McClintock, the HIGHEST VOTE GETTER FOR THE REPUBLICANS IN 2002 ?

[b9]

I don't get the impression that you are so much pro-Arnold as you are pro-progress, which no dem will EVER provide.

[ElkGroveDan]

So the Republicans keep running ultraconservatives with zero charisma and they keep losing. Then they do it again and again.

But you are missing the part where we also keep nominating ultra liberal Republicans who can't win either. "They do it again and again." I could offer even more convincing arguments that it's the nomination of moderates like Tom Campbell and Gary Mendoza and Ruben Barrales and Michael Huffington and John Seymour and Matt Fong that is causing us to lose elections.