Then, their usual taunt about any of us not currently residing in CA had just "better shut up" or by calling us other names. But boyo, do they love anyone else in any other state, maybe even other countries, joining in on their "ideology" and slamming at the rest of us. That's okay, in their books.
Nah. I've seen the game. Ain't fooled. Most of us stay out of these threads and because there's this wickedly nasting tag-teaming going on which crosses the line of debate. And an ideology they have which they aren't at all coming clean on.
I can appreciate views which express dismay with Gov S. And from anywhere. There's legitimate disagreement; and then there's "something else" a foot.
A certain specific "identity group" bootstraps "conservative principles. Where I lived in CA it was VERY obvious what these folks were up to. They support "quotas" for whites, etc. Support "abortion" (but in their unspoken caveats) for minorities only)
It's that "something else" which continues to be played out on all of us, here on FR and I do perceive more "notable" types are also seeing it at their levels of interactions.
And that's how I read it.
What you've posted, FairOpinion, is correct in my POV. And Doodlelady's term is also very apt, as I've posted elsewhere.
And now, I'm putting on my cyber flak gear for the rest of what is sure to come at me, again.. lol.
It's predictable.
I've tried analyzing this, over the past year, using various other models. The results keep coming up the same.
I can appreciate views which express dismay with Gov S. And from anywhere. There's legitimate disagreement; and then there's "something else" a foot.
A certain specific "identity group" bootstraps "conservative principles. Where I lived in CA it was VERY obvious what these folks were up to. They support "quotas" for whites, etc. Support "abortion" (but in their unspoken caveats) for minorities only)
It's that "something else" which continues to be played out on all of us, here on FR and I do perceive more "notable" types are also seeing it at their levels of interactions.
And that's how I read it.
I certainly hope you are NOT referring to people on this thread. If you are, this is OVER THE TOP!
"And 90% of the California voters will NOT vote for McClintock no matter what. So guess who is going to get elected? Certainly NOT McClintock." -- Fair Opinion 1/13/2006
Anything but correct, that's for sure.
Oh this is rich, when you can't argue facts, you demonize with a totally fabricated strawman. I want citations. Supply a list or recant.