Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: calcowgirl
Okay then, why didn't McClintock spend more money? I assume he couldn't raise it.

Why couldn't he raise it?
107 posted on 01/13/2006 10:16:45 PM PST by birbear (Admit it. you clicked on the "I have already previewed" button without actually previewing the post.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: birbear
Okay then, why didn't McClintock spend more money? I assume he couldn't raise it. Why couldn't he raise it?

I don't know for sure. Perhaps it was because the Republican Party was all tapped out, giving their support instead to their preferred "more moderate" candidates like McPherson. McClintock was outspent 5 to 1 (running against a candidate that appeared to be moderate), and came within spitting distance. McPherson was outspent only 1.6 to 1 and couldn't beat a Mexican separatist. McPherson got lots of financial support from the party leaders while McClintock got little.

Candidate                                     Vote Pct.  Spent($MM) 

LT GOVERNOR RACE - 2002
Cruz M. Bustamante  Leftist Democrat          49.5%      $4.6 
Bruce Mc Pherson    Moderate Republican       41.8%      $2.8 

CONTROLLER RACE - 2002
Steve Westly        Moderate Democrat         45.4%      $10.6 
Tom McClintock      Conservative Republican   45.1%      $2.0 

206 posted on 01/14/2006 1:18:25 PM PST by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson