Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Here's a fun one ...

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

Article X, Section 9(A) of the state constitution provides in pertinent part as follows:

No . . . employee in the classified service shall participate or engage in political activity; . . . except to exercise his right as a citizen to express his opinion privately, to serve as a commissioner or official watcher at the polls, and to cast his vote as he desires.

Article X, Section 9(C) defines "political activity" as "an effort to support or oppose the election of a candidate for political office or to support a particular political party in an election." The same prohibition is reiterated in Civil Service Rule 14.1(e) and the definition of "political activity" is reiterated in Civil Service Rule 1.24.1.

In this case, respondent wrote, for publication, a column that opposed the election of a candidate (Bush) for political office (the Presidency) and supported a particular political party (the Democratic Party) in an election. This is a clear violation of the Article; respondent far exceeded his right "as a citizen to express his opinion privately."

Accordingly, pursuant to Section 10(A)(4) of the Civil Service Article, respondent is hereby suspended for a period of 5 working days. At the option of his employing agency, a reduction in pay that is the economic equivalent of a 5 day suspension may be substituted for this suspension. In deciding the appropriate penalty, the Commission took into consideration respondent's years of service as well as the fact that the violation was not wilful.

http://www.dscs.state.la.us/appeals/opinions/0010457.HTM

This guy got dinged for composing a published article. Yikes. I wonder if a letter to the editor is also proscribed activity.
28 posted on 01/13/2006 5:34:15 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt
I as a State Employee and a member of the Army Reserve had a "Impeach Clinton" bumper sticker, my only defense was that it was on the passenger side and that was the Wife's side and that it was "her" bumper sticker, even though I agreed with it.

I cannot infringe my Wife's freedom of speech (can't even slow her down ;^)

TT
29 posted on 01/13/2006 5:39:30 PM PST by TexasTransplant (NEMO ME IMPUNE LACESSET)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson