Yet Sen. Shrillery will claim it's because she's screeching.
1 posted on
01/13/2006 3:54:06 PM PST by
SandRat
To: 2LT Radix jr; 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub; 80 Square Miles; AlaninSA; A Ruckus of Dogs; acad1228; ...
Improving troop body armor protection
2 posted on
01/13/2006 3:54:45 PM PST by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: SandRat
Why do you think my LAPD officer brother worries about punks learning to shoot for his head? Could it be that widespread knowledge of our use of body armor changes our enemies tactics? That is what he seems to think.
3 posted on
01/13/2006 3:58:24 PM PST by
RKV
( He who has the guns, makes the rules.)
To: SandRat
"The protection of soldiers is our No. 1 mission," Speakes said.
I would disagree. When we first discovered that the terrorist were using cell phones to activate IAD's we chose not to turn of cell coverage in those areas.
Of course, terrorist use different devices now. But in the beginning we chose commerce over protection. Since are Military isn't based on that technology it would not have affected us in any way.
4 posted on
01/13/2006 5:40:49 PM PST by
Tyche
(A half truth is a whole lie)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson