To: pigdog
Section VIII --- The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States
The National Sales Tax is not an Excise. It is not a specific, fixed, absolute charge on a particular commodity. It is a general, percentage-based and therefore variable (based on variable market price) Tax which is charged universally on all transactions, commodities or services.
The National Sales Tax is not a Duty or Impost. It is not a tax solely levied on imports or exports.
Section IX --- No Capitation, or other direct, Tax shall be laid, unless in Proportion to the Census or Enumeration herein before directed to be taken
The National Sales Tax is not a Direct Tax proportional to the actual census of the population of the Several States. It is a Direct Tax which is proportional to consumption - which can vary a great deal from State population to State population.
It is not a Constitutional Tax.
It is, however, an "absolute violation" of the Commerce Clause, by Unconstitutionally introducing the Taxing Power of the Federal Government into the transactions of one man with another, internally transacting commerce within the boundaries of the Sovereign State.
--Robert S. McIntyre, New York Times, Jan. 25, 1998
44 posted on
01/14/2006 9:40:20 AM PST by
hedgetrimmer
("Free trade". The wealth building system for communists. Contact Jiang Zehmin, Beijing for more info)
To: hedgetrimmer; ancient_geezer; pigdog; Conservative Goddess
It is not a Constitutional Tax.Sigh!! I don't know WHY we have to go back and plow this VERY old furrow again but I guess we must.
Hedgetrimmer I would ask you to please do us all the favor of going and reading this old thread before we continue with this discussion.
47 posted on
01/14/2006 10:04:51 AM PST by
Bigun
(IRS sucks @getridof it.com)
To: hedgetrimmer
Stuff and nonsense. Check the link given in #47 for the detailed reading from a Profewaaor of Law at Georgetown where he teaches advanced constitutional law.
I'd certainly recognize his views over your odd notions unless you can demonstrate you have some similar legal/constitutional standing.
Thanks, Bigun.
48 posted on
01/14/2006 11:46:19 AM PST by
pigdog
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson