Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

USDA Using Satellites to Monitor Farmers
My Way.com ^ | Jan 13, 7:44 AM (ET) | ROXANA HEGEMAN

Posted on 01/13/2006 9:00:25 AM PST by Thebaddog

WICHITA, Kan. (AP) - Satellites have monitored crop conditions around the world for decades, helping traders predict futures prices in commodities markets and governments anticipate crop shortages.

But those satellite images are now increasingly turning up in courtrooms across the nation as the Agriculture Department's Risk Management Agency cracks down on farmers involved in crop insurance fraud.

The Agriculture Department's Farm Service Agency, which helps farmers get loans and payments from a number of its programs, also uses satellite imaging to monitor compliance.

Across government and private industry alike, satellite imaging technology is being used in water rights litigation and in prosecution of environmental cases ranging from a hog confinement facility's violations of waste discharge regulations to injury damage lawsuits stemming from herbicide applications. The technology is also used to monitor the forestry and mining industries.

"A lot of farmers would be shocked at the detail you can tell. What it does is keep honest folks honest," said G.A. "Art" Barnaby Jr., an agricultural economist at Kansas State University.

Satellite technology, which takes images at roughly eight-day intervals, can be used to monitor when farmers plant their acreage, how they irrigate them and what crops they grow. If anomalies are found in a farm's insurance claim, investigators can search satellite photos dating back years to determine cropping practices on individual fields.

What's catching the attention of Barnaby and others is a spate of recent cases involving the use of satellite imaging to prosecute farmers. The largest so far has been a North Carolina case in which a couple faked weather damage to their crops by having workers throw ice cubes onto a tomato field and then beat the plants.

In September, Robert Warren was sentenced to six years and four months in prison, while his wife, Viki, was sentenced to five years and five months. They were also ordered to forfeit $7.3 million and pay $9.15 million in restitution.

The Warrens and at least three other defendants pleaded guilty. But in one related trial that went to a jury, prosecutors used satellite images and testimony from a satellite image analyst to present their case.

"It was impressive to the jury to have this presentation about this eye in the sky and satellite imagery and a trained expert," said Richard Edwards, the assistant U.S. Attorney in North Carolina who prosecuted the case. "In our case it did not make the case, but it sure helped and strengthened and improved the case."

The Risk Management Agency is involved in three other multimillion-dollar crop insurance fraud cases that have yet to be filed that will rival the Warren case in scope, said Michael Hand, RMA's deputy administrator for compliance.

While fewer than 100 cases have been prosecuted using satellite imaging since the RMA started its crackdown in 2001, data mining - coupled with satellite imaging - pinpoints about 1,500 farms annually that are put on a watch list for possible crop fraud, Hand said. Ground inspections are done on the suspect farms throughout the growing season.

The agency says its spot checklist generated by the satellite data has saved taxpayers between $71 million and $110 million a year in fraudulent crop insurance claims since 2001.

The agency stepped up its enforcement after the Agriculture Risk Protection Act of 2000 mandated it use data mining to ferret out false claims, Hand said. Every year, it ships claims data to the Center for Agriculture Excellence at Tarleton State University in Stephensville, Texas, where analysts look for anomalies in claims. They generate a list of claims for further investigation, with satellite imaging pulled on the most egregious cases.

Just as U.S. satellites kept track of things like the wheat harvest in the former Soviet Union, other countries have also launched satellites to monitor American crops. Germany, France and others have satellites monitoring crop conditions, and many other private firms sell those images in the U.S.

"Everybody spies on everybody. I was stunned to hear that myself," Edwards said. "Someday, I may have to rely on a French satellite to convict an American citizen."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: agriculture; eavesdropping; farming; sattelites; usda
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
Now why is this not a problem when monitoring terrorist's phone calls can get the NYT going off?
1 posted on 01/13/2006 9:00:27 AM PST by Thebaddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Thebaddog

Tarleton, the better half of the A&M system!


2 posted on 01/13/2006 9:03:25 AM PST by mtbopfuyn (Legality does not dictate morality... Lavin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thebaddog
That evil Bush!

Domestic animal spying again!

3 posted on 01/13/2006 9:03:30 AM PST by George Smiley (This tagline deliberately targeted journalists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thebaddog
Interesting, this thread was from earlier in the month: Prescott unleashes spy satellites to check on home improvements (U.K.)

THE government has advised council-tax inspectors to use “spy in the sky” satellite cameras to snoop on people’s homes to see if they have added extensions, conservatories and even sheds that could boost the value of their property, writes David Cracknell. The Tories have unearthed official documents which show that John Prescott, the deputy prime minister, plans to use pictures from space as part of his revaluation of homes across England.

The data will be used to reband people’s homes over the next few years, meaning that property owners whose houses have shot up in value face higher council tax bills.


Don't be surpised to see this stuff catch on in the US - as far why nobody is noticing it, it's because most writers aren't farmers, so they don't care.
4 posted on 01/13/2006 9:05:00 AM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thebaddog

I used google to view my house from space. I'm spying illegally on myself!!!


5 posted on 01/13/2006 9:08:50 AM PST by Frenetic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thebaddog
That's good,at least they are looking for fraud in an area rife with fraud, however in our state, the county government's use the same technology to watch homeowners who might dare trim their trees, remove brush, or harvest blackberries without the proper permits.

Another totalitarian idea from an "enlightened Utopian blue state" that will be working its way East, count on it.
6 posted on 01/13/2006 9:09:50 AM PST by bigfootbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thebaddog

No subsidies, then no monitoring.


7 posted on 01/13/2006 9:09:51 AM PST by rightinthemiddle (I might be wrong, but I'm always right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day; aculeus; Larry Lucido; Petronski; hellinahandcart; Tijeras_Slim; ...
... a North Carolina case in which a couple faked weather damage to their crops by having workers throw ice cubes onto a tomato field and then beat the plants.

Pinging the Violence Against Fruits and Vegetables list.

(The couple should have claimed self-defense.)

8 posted on 01/13/2006 9:10:56 AM PST by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thebaddog

This is nothing more than remote auditing. If it's permissible for Government auditors to visit in person (and it is), it's permissible to use satellites for the same reason.


9 posted on 01/13/2006 9:12:35 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr
Don't be surpised to see this stuff catch on in the US


Been going on since at least 1996 in W. Oregon. Every year I think about putting up camo netting, but, that's one of those things my wife draws the line at.
10 posted on 01/13/2006 9:13:00 AM PST by crazyhorse691 (Diplomacy doesn't work when seagulls rain on your parade. A shotgun and umbrella does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Thebaddog

The federal government can "spy" on farmers to find any sort of fraud they want too.... and in one case listed in the article, a couple served time - a lot more than that child rapists on the east coast......

go figure.


11 posted on 01/13/2006 9:15:01 AM PST by TheBattman (Islam (and liberalism)- the cult of Satan and a Cancer on Society)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thebaddog
California has been using aerial (not satellite)photographs of farms in the San Joaquin Valley since at least 1981, probably much earlier. Even those maps were very detailed.

Muleteam1

12 posted on 01/13/2006 9:21:20 AM PST by Muleteam1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman

It's also pretty easy for the trained eye to pick out illicit crops.


13 posted on 01/13/2006 9:22:49 AM PST by July 4th (A vacant lot cancelled out my vote for Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Frenetic

My son sent me satellite view of my home in So. Cal. It was creepy. The detail was unreal. I am now busy spying on myself. I will let you all know if I am up to anything bad. LOL So far I am still just a fat lazy housewife. ha


14 posted on 01/13/2006 9:33:49 AM PST by buffyt (America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our people. Pres. George Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dighton; aculeus; Larry Lucido; Petronski; hellinahandcart; Tijeras_Slim
(The couple should have claimed self-defense.)


15 posted on 01/13/2006 9:57:23 AM PST by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Thebaddog
I use all the satellite imaging I can get a hold of to spy on possible fishing locations. I hope that PETA doesn't find out and tell the ACLU.
16 posted on 01/13/2006 10:11:28 AM PST by BallyBill (Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Muleteam1
They have software now they hookup with these satellite photos and fertilizers so they can apply pesticides to specific square feet of crop; the result is no over/under fertilizing.
17 posted on 01/13/2006 2:45:07 PM PST by SF Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SF Republican
>>They have software now they hookup with these satellite photos and fertilizers so they can apply pesticides to specific square feet of crop<<

Interesting. I've worked on large pesticide application programs (grasshopper control) where cockpit-mounted computer-guidance systems "triangulated" off ground towers but never a satellite guided system. Even these could lay a pretty accurate spray swath. In smaller programs we simply "flagged" the aircraft on the ground.

Muleteam1

18 posted on 01/13/2006 4:47:47 PM PST by Muleteam1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: rightinthemiddle

These were insurance claims.


19 posted on 01/13/2006 4:54:35 PM PST by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: FOG724; SierraWasp

Ping


20 posted on 01/15/2006 7:20:55 AM PST by Issaquahking (Build nukes, Harvest timber, Drill ANWR, Because it's good earth use, not abuse!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson