Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Millicent_Hornswaggle
The Oscars' predilection for 'Disease of the Week' acting is a long standing problem but his thesis that only actors playing positive characters are worthy of awards doesn't make much sense.
10 posted on 01/13/2006 8:03:38 AM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Borges
I also think Swank (for her first award, at least), Berry and Theron all deserved their Oscars. Let's face it: leading actresses usually aren't given good roles which would permit them to stretch their ranges.

A lot of the time, Oscars are given as "compensations". Denzel Washington gave a good performance in the routine Training Day, and was rewarded seemingly in compensation for not getting it for his searing perfromances as Malcolm X and Hurricane Carter. Nicole Kidman had proved herself to be more than "Mrs. Tom Cruise" after giving superb performances in To Die For, and The Others, and an excellent one in Moulin Rouge, yet she got the award for The Hours, which was an ensemble film. I think Julianne Moore gave the best performance out of the three in that film.

29 posted on 01/13/2006 8:51:22 AM PST by RightWingAtheist ("Why thank you Mr.Obama, I'm proud to be a Darwinist!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson