[r9etb]

Wonder why it requires man to do something that should be occurring NATURALLY according to that TOE.

Actually, it's stuff like this (not to mention the glow-in-the-dark Taiwanese pigs) that destroys any claim that ID is not "scientific."

That said, I think what we're seeing here is something much different, in the realm of "can vs. should."

[Just mythoughts]

"Actually, it's stuff like this (not to mention the glow-in-the-dark Taiwanese pigs) that destroys any claim that ID is not "scientific."

That said, I think what we're seeing here is something much different, in the realm of "can vs. should.""


I do not hear the evolutionary fittest rejecting the playing 'god' with the human genes. So this "ID" business appears to be about to whom "ID" will be assigned.