"Albright told everyone that Michelman had provided 'a voice for those who didn't have a voice and a brain for those who didn't have a brain.'" Isn't it just a wee bit perverse to hail the doyenne of the right-to-kill-the-unborn lobby as speaking for the "voiceless"?
http://newsbusters.org/node/3561
I'll believe she's speaking for the most vulnerable among us when she's screaming in terror at the sight of her own image.
Yes, but isn't it a bit odd that she was so up front in pointing out that the democrat party is dependent on brainless people who don't know how to speak in complete sentences?