Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: biggerten

"I'm not a lawyer, and I don't play one on TV, but-
There are 'dry' counties and states that ban alcohol, why is this different?"

Because there are two amendments to the US Constitution dealing with alcohol, one prohibiting its manufacture and importation, and the second one striking that one down and explicitly leaving its regulation to the states.

So, the Constitution says, explicitly, that the states can prohibit alcohol, even though that's interfering with interstate commerce. The Constitution doesn't say that about tobacco. Now, a state's rights advocate could assert that therefore it's entirely up to the states, but a free-market, free-flow-of-commerce capitalist could argue that banning tobacco locally interferes with interstate commerce generally, and he would have a good argument under the commerce clause cases of the last 70 years or so.

Alcohol is different, because it's actually in the Constitution. No other product is.

How this one comes out depends on the judges deciding it.


43 posted on 01/12/2006 12:45:43 PM PST by Vicomte13 (Et alors?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Vicomte13

Thanks for the clear explanation.

Guess that's why I'm not a lawyer, nor do I play one on TV.


77 posted on 01/12/2006 2:38:36 PM PST by biggerten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson