Skip to comments.
Elk Grove (IL) eyes ban on selling cigarettes
Chicago Tribune ^
| 1/12/06
| Richard Wronski
Posted on 01/12/2006 12:12:48 PM PST by elkfersupper
Worried that measures to limit smoking don't go far enough, Elk Grove Village officials are considering banning the sale of cigarettes, apparently the first time that has been seriously proposed in Illinois, experts said. Mayor Craig Johnson said the village would be hypocritical to consider a current proposal to restrict smoking in bars and restaurants without going after cigarettes themselves. "If we think smoking is so detrimental to the community that we should ban it, then we should think about a ban on selling cigarettes,"
(Excerpt) Read more at chicagotribune.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: pufflist; puritanism; smokiing; smokingban
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-98 next last
Well, here we go.
Coming soon to your town / county / state.
To: SheLion; Gabz
"It will never happen" Ping.
To: elkfersupper
Coming soon to your town / county / state. I doubt it. Sure this small town may ban the sale of cigarettes within the town limits.
But the states and Feds have too much of a need for the tax revenue. Government makes more money on cigarettes than cigarette companies do.
3
posted on
01/12/2006 12:15:07 PM PST
by
Phantom Lord
(Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
To: elkfersupper
The mayor of Elk Grove, Johnson, is a RINO. He tried to stop O'Hare airport Expansion and lost. People in the Cook County suburbs of Chicago will just drive a mile and buy in Dupage County, robbing Elk Grove of Sales Tax. DIMWITS
4
posted on
01/12/2006 12:16:19 PM PST
by
Jack Ian
To: Phantom Lord
When has government ever acted with enough for site to avoid shooting itself in the foot?
I think that there will be a lot more of this soon.
5
posted on
01/12/2006 12:17:00 PM PST
by
redgolum
("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
To: elkfersupper
"If we think smoking is so detrimental to the community that we should ban it, then we should think about a ban on selling cigarettes,"
How long before nicotine addicts share prison space with heroin addicts?
.
6
posted on
01/12/2006 12:17:14 PM PST
by
radioman
To: elkfersupper
Although I believe these people are wrong and misguided, not to say taking an unconstitutional process to its ultimate conclusion, I have to admire their honesty.
The are not willing to rake in more and more revenues based on lies.
There is something unsettling about all the anti-smoking laws nationwide, specially those addressing second-hand smoke, based on lies, fraud and misrepresentation.
7
posted on
01/12/2006 12:17:19 PM PST
by
Publius6961
(The IQ of California voters is about 420........... .............cumulatively)
To: elkfersupper
Being that the president of the State Senate is a smoker, as much as it pains me to do this elkfersupper, ;) I have to agree with you. Never Gonna Happen!!!!
To: elkfersupper
Whatever happened to good old tar and feathers? What is next? Alcohol?
9
posted on
01/12/2006 12:18:52 PM PST
by
beltfed308
(Cloth or link. Happiness is a perfect trunnion.)
To: redgolum
I would enjoy a great deal watching a state ban the sale of cigarettes within its borders and then wack the residents with a tax increase to make up for the lost revenue. It would almost be deserved by the anti-smoking crowd that they get wacked with higher taxes.
I would prefer though that the next time a state passes a smoking ban, sues a tobacco company, or takes some action against tobacco that tobacco companies announce that clearly the state is not interested in it citizens enjoying its product and they will hence for no longer sell to that state.
How fast would the states sue to get cigarettes back on the shelves?
10
posted on
01/12/2006 12:19:50 PM PST
by
Phantom Lord
(Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
To: elkfersupper
This is just as stupid and ill-thought out as the "dry counties" we have here in Texas-people just drive over to the liquor store right across the county line to spend their money-and the "dry county" doesn't get a penny of the tax revenue from the sales.
11
posted on
01/12/2006 12:21:02 PM PST
by
Texan5
(You've got to saddle up your boys, you've got to draw a hard line..)
To: elkfersupper
Isn'tg Elk Grove Village one big warehouse park in the flight path of O'hare? Which one of those warehouse kids will be the first to go postal withdrawing from nicotine?
12
posted on
01/12/2006 12:21:21 PM PST
by
Thebaddog
(K9 4ever)
To: elkfersupper
This is not a smokers issue. It is a Freedom issue.
Someone, some category WILL be next.
To: elkfersupper
Yep, they learned they couldn't bring on prohibition suddenly, so they are going the slow route.
14
posted on
01/12/2006 12:23:59 PM PST
by
sandbar
(when)
To: elkfersupper
Interferes with interstate commerce.
Federal court should strike it down.
15
posted on
01/12/2006 12:24:04 PM PST
by
Vicomte13
(Et alors?)
To: Phantom Lord
That takes care of the money leg of the three-legged stool.
What about the power and control legs?
To: elkfersupper
Liberty is overrated.
Who needs all that personal decision making, anyway.
17
posted on
01/12/2006 12:27:59 PM PST
by
aligncare
(Watergate killed journalism)
To: elkfersupper
Methinks the Mayor is trying to make a point.
18
posted on
01/12/2006 12:29:10 PM PST
by
Wolfie
To: elkfersupper; eyespysomething
Elk Grove Village's proposal came as Des Plaines and Park Ridge considered tighter limits Wednesday on smoking in public places. In Chicago, most public places are to become smoke-free Monday.
I'm sick of this "public places" crap. It's a skewing of the meaning of words to try to make "publicly accessible places" such as businesses the same as "public property" which is government owned property.
19
posted on
01/12/2006 12:29:25 PM PST
by
SittinYonder
(That's how I saw it, and see it still.)
To: elkfersupper
And there goes a PILE of taxes with the cigs...
20
posted on
01/12/2006 12:29:44 PM PST
by
Tzimisce
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-98 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson