Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cicero
But time is running out. The threshold will soon be crossed when the Iranian facilities become "hot," meaning an attack on the sites would endanger the environment, most likely causing the deaths of tens of thousands of civilians in Iran. Can you say Chernobyl?

What he is saying is we need to strike now. If we wait, the collateral damage will be greater.

8 posted on 01/12/2006 9:52:12 AM PST by Dark Skies ("A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants." -- Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Dark Skies

Yes, but the writer pretends that is the worst outcome. It's not. The worst outcome is if we wait a little longer, dithering and whining--probably less than a year at this point. Then it won't just be radioactivity scattered around Iran, it will be radioactivity all over the place, and tens of millions or even hundreds of millions of deaths, depending on whether the conflict can be localized.

History suggests that once things spiral that far out of control, conflicts cannot be localized.


45 posted on 01/12/2006 11:17:25 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson