Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bahbah
I think that there is room for a difference of opinion on Graham's performance in these hearings.

Graham seemed to me to be not only calling Bush a criminal for the NSA bru-ha-ha but actually calling for the death penalty for him for the "torture" of terrorists.

310 posted on 01/12/2006 6:43:30 AM PST by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies ]


To: bkepley

Isn't it amazing how fat teddy comes to the most ugly of conclusions? How does forming a conclusion, without Alito's answer not objected to?
Pig.


350 posted on 01/12/2006 6:46:55 AM PST by jackv (just shakin' my head)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies ]

To: bkepley

The trouble with Graham yesterday was that he rambled all over the place.

The guy had a ton of issues he wanted to touch on and make some kind of a point about. Some of them do involve the President, and it all got so tangled even I who am great at following the worst meanderings could not follow him. But I will guarantee one thing: Graham did not mean to state that he has decided that President Bush has tortured people and deserves the death penalty for it.

You can take that one to the bank, whatever he sounded like to you.


371 posted on 01/12/2006 6:49:38 AM PST by txrangerette ("We are fighting al-Qaeda, NOT Aunt Sadie"...Dick Cheney commenting on the wiretaps!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson