Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RightWhale
Hello,

Good question, and one that I can't answer. It seems to me that the USSC "jumped the shark" decades ago. It was stacked with judges that had an agenda, that only looked for ways to achieve their goals, despite what the Constitution said. If we can ever get back to a SC that reads the damn thing, literally, we will win. It's that simple. Glad to be here, MOgirl
2,803 posted on 01/12/2006 2:37:31 PM PST by MOgirl (Now looking for a new tagline. I'll let you know how it goes....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2722 | View Replies ]


To: MOgirl

I don't know, either. Seems that there are a lot of laws coming out of Congress, and even more regulations that follow, that would conflict with the Bill of Rights. But, the USSC does not review every law, only certain cases get on their agendum, and most of those have to do with decisions by lower and state courts.


2,828 posted on 01/12/2006 2:43:38 PM PST by RightWhale (pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2803 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson