To: Do not dub me shapka broham
I guess Durbin would be for suicide bombers keeping their wares then.
1,557 posted on
01/12/2006 9:52:23 AM PST by
AliVeritas
(DNC - The longer the nose, the more we expose. No Costco, it's Sam's Club for me.)
To: AliVeritas
1,563 posted on
01/12/2006 9:53:13 AM PST by
Howlin
(Defeatism may have its partisan uses, but it is not justified by the facts. - GWB, 12/18/05)
To: AliVeritas
I guess Durbin would be for suicide bombers keeping their wares then. Looks that way to me.
1,568 posted on
01/12/2006 9:54:12 AM PST by
pepperhead
(Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
To: AliVeritas
The strip search of a ten year old is a non-issue. There was evidence that they may have hid drugs on the child. So, having a female officer search the child to make sure she did not have any drugs was prudent. What if they did not search the child and the child had dangerous drugs on her which she took and died from. Or, maybe the child might have given the drugs to another child, or taken them to school, etc, etc.
They were protecting the child. geesh!
1,578 posted on
01/12/2006 9:55:41 AM PST by
isthisnickcool
(Quoting Hillary Clinton: "You know, you know, you know, you know.....")
To: AliVeritas
Apparently so.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson