To: saalebhosdike; Alamo-Girl; xzins; betty boop; jude24; blue-duncan
In re Intelligent Design, the Darwinists have pretty much won. Their victory springs not so much from the strength of their ideas, but from their success in preventing Intelligent Discussion. They control the zeitgeist of the somewhat educated, as for example judges. It is enough.Wow, that is so well put!
4 posted on
01/11/2006 8:38:44 PM PST by
P-Marlowe
To: P-Marlowe
Indeed. Thanks for the ping!
14 posted on
01/11/2006 9:39:55 PM PST by
Alamo-Girl
(Monthly is the best way to donate to Free Republic!)
To: P-Marlowe
" Their victory springs not so much from the strength of their ideas, but from their success in preventing Intelligent Discussion."What prevented Behe and the ID crowd putting on some intelligent discussion in court? Zeitgeist?
18 posted on
01/11/2006 10:00:33 PM PST by
spunkets
To: P-Marlowe
Controlling or dominating the discussion isn't very difficult when lines like this are considered insightful.
"Do you never wake up at three in the morning and think, Where in the name ofin the name of Logical Positivism, I suppose you would thinkare we?"
At three in the morning I should hope the wonderer is in his own bed, in his own home, with his own wife.
Thanks to Liberalism and the Communism Lite crowd, such is no longer a given in all too much of America.
Make that all too much of Red State America.
37 posted on
01/12/2006 2:41:58 AM PST by
GladesGuru
(In a society predicated upon Liberty, it is essential to examine principle)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson