Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Growing Sense of Inevitability' About Alito Confirmation (MSM Deeply Saddened!)
CNS news/GOPUSA ^ | January 11, 2006 | Susan Jones

Posted on 01/11/2006 6:02:49 AM PST by prairiebreeze

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last
Sweeeeet. LOL!
1 posted on 01/11/2006 6:02:50 AM PST by prairiebreeze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Peach; Mo1; Molly Pitcher

A good collection of how the liberal media is whining or becoming resigned about Alito's confirmation. Haaaa!!

Ping


2 posted on 01/11/2006 6:03:42 AM PST by prairiebreeze (Take the high road. You'll never have to meet a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
Does anyone remember the controversy about Harriett Miers? How many Bush-bots did you hear say that we needed a "stealth" nominee because a more open conservative would not make it?

Ha, ha, ha, ha!
3 posted on 01/11/2006 6:07:37 AM PST by TSchmereL ("Rust but terrify.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

Some of us kept trying to tell the Nervous Nellies around here that a constitutionalist judge could be confirmed. There were those who said we needed a Miers type to keep from losing. In truth, any constitutionalist judge who looks decent (an easy accomplishment) and can outperform the Democrats intellectually (a given) can be confirmed in a 55-45 GOP Senate. Brown, Owen, or any of the other supposed lightning rods would have also been confirmed. The public simply will not tolerate the Democrats' abuse as long as our side fights back.


4 posted on 01/11/2006 6:08:10 AM PST by puroresu (Conservatism is an observation; Liberalism is an ideology)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

Well, lets look at the NYT at least they can watch the confirmations on tv so they don't have to have fake travel and dinner receipts from fake reporters for this event.


Next week, back to the fake stories.


5 posted on 01/11/2006 6:08:17 AM PST by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
Alliance for Justice President Nan Aron described Alito as "evasive," waffling, and said the American people "deserve a fuller, more forthright discussion of Judge Alito's record and views."

If that had been the general consensus on the confirmation standards in the 90's we wouldn't have Darth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court today.

6 posted on 01/11/2006 6:08:46 AM PST by VRWCmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze



UNSTOPPABLE?

7 posted on 01/11/2006 6:10:12 AM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze; martin_fierro; wagglebee
Media Schadenfreude Alert...

This is toooo funny!

8 posted on 01/11/2006 6:10:14 AM PST by Pharmboy (The stone age didn't end because they ran out of stones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TSchmereL

Yep! If Miers had gone forward, she might have been confirmed, but she wouldn't have made a good impression since she doesn't have any grounding in constitutional law. The Rats could have made her stumble. Once on the court, she might have been okay, but then again she might have charged to the left. At best, she'd be concurring with constitutionalist rulings, while not being an intellectual force. But given her record of flip-flopping I'd bet on her becoming another O'Connor.


9 posted on 01/11/2006 6:11:56 AM PST by puroresu (Conservatism is an observation; Liberalism is an ideology)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

Oh yeah. I think the Dems knew this goin' in.


10 posted on 01/11/2006 6:12:42 AM PST by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
The DNC website said, "Judge Alito almost gives the impression of a man who will say anything he can in a job interview to get that job."

What nonsense! The President has already picked Alito for the job, it's not the Senate or dims perogative to 'interview' him like they are hiring him.

11 posted on 01/11/2006 6:14:38 AM PST by GaltMeister (“All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

Indeed...the fact that they made speeches rather than questioned him is one tipoff.


12 posted on 01/11/2006 6:15:25 AM PST by Pharmboy (The stone age didn't end because they ran out of stones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TSchmereL

*** "Does anyone remember the controversy about Harriett Miers? How many Bush-bots did you hear say that we needed a "stealth" nominee because a more open conservative would not make it?" ***

Did you listen to his answers to the questions?

He is not going in there and supporting devout conservatism, he is coming off as a former conservative who still holds firm on certain principles, but not as firmly as he used to.

He acknowledged a "right to privacy", the "authority of the court to re-interpret the constitution", and gave strong authority to precedent. In other words, he gave the Dems what they want.

I am hoping that he is being soft enough to get approved, then comes back to being a real conservative.

In other words, a stealth conservative.


13 posted on 01/11/2006 6:16:44 AM PST by Paloma_55 (Which part of "Common Sense" do you not understand???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Paloma_55

Oh, Okay. Let me see if I have this right. Even though Alito has been an open and vocal conservative for decades, unlike Miers, because Alito is smart enough to blow some smoke in the Lefty Democrat Senators faces at his confirmation hearing, he is suddenly a "stealth conservative" or maybe even has taken a sharp Left turn?

Get real, please.


14 posted on 01/11/2006 6:22:30 AM PST by TSchmereL ("Rust but terrify.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
Big Media deeply saddened
15 posted on 01/11/2006 6:23:07 AM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paloma_55
The right to privacy that Alito acknowledged is the "specific" right to privacy in the Fourth Amendment, not the "general" right to privacy used in Roe. His answer was brilliant!
16 posted on 01/11/2006 6:24:24 AM PST by TSchmereL ("Rust but terrify.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember
Darth Bader Ginsburg

LOL, good one. And a valid point but we also know that what applies to RATS one day doesn't have to apply the next.

17 posted on 01/11/2006 6:24:45 AM PST by prairiebreeze (Take the high road. You'll never have to meet a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TSchmereL

I was also just thinking about how the Miers fans were saying that intellect above a pretty low threshold doesn't matter, that any lawyer or in fact anyone who has read the Constitution could do that job...and thus that anyone who has read the Constitution would be able to state our case intelligently and get by.

Does anyone seriously believe that Miers performance would have been as steady, serious and unflappable as our man Alito?

Thank goodness that the President saw the light and got her out and Alito in! And thank goodness for the scores who stood up and said no to Miers....including all those who did so here at FR!!!


18 posted on 01/11/2006 6:26:44 AM PST by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GaltMeister

"The DNC website said, "Judge Alito almost gives the impression of a man who will say anything he can in a job interview to get that job."

Well, what do they expect. When consistently confronted with a lynch mob Democrat Judical Committee, it would only be prudent to hide.


19 posted on 01/11/2006 6:26:58 AM PST by FastCoyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeDude

Amen, Brother! Amen!


20 posted on 01/11/2006 6:28:19 AM PST by TSchmereL ("Rust but terrify.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson