We've had false alarms before, but you never know ...
To: VadeRetro; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Doctor Stochastic; js1138; Shryke; RightWhale; ...
SciencePing |
An elite subset of the Evolution list. See the list's explanation at my freeper homepage. Then FReepmail to be added or dropped. |
|
|
|
2 posted on
01/10/2006 6:16:46 PM PST by
PatrickHenry
(Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.)
To: PatrickHenry
We're doomed, Patrick. Doomed I tell you.
:)
3 posted on
01/10/2006 6:18:04 PM PST by
writer33
(Rush Limbaugh walks in the footsteps of giants: George Washington, Thomas Paine and Ronald Reagan.)
To: PatrickHenry
I love it - a physicist named Putterman.
4 posted on
01/10/2006 6:20:53 PM PST by
SuzyQue
To: PatrickHenry
Cold fusion and "failed to replicate." Seen it before.
5 posted on
01/10/2006 6:22:12 PM PST by
VadeRetro
(Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
To: PatrickHenry
The key theorist behind the 'tiny bubbles' approach to tabletop fusion:
To: PatrickHenry
7 posted on
01/10/2006 6:23:41 PM PST by
Argus
To: PatrickHenry
You know I always suspected that percolated coffee provided more energy.
9 posted on
01/10/2006 6:24:59 PM PST by
kcar
(theUNsucks.com)
To: PatrickHenry
10 posted on
01/10/2006 6:25:54 PM PST by
AFreeBird
(your mileage may vary)
To: PatrickHenry
Another obvious problem is that even if fusion does occur, how do you get substantial energy out past the fluid that is sonoluminescing? Sure the fluid itself can transfer the energy, but while it is doing that, it is largely no longer available for the reaction.
11 posted on
01/10/2006 6:27:04 PM PST by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
To: PatrickHenry
You forgot a picture of the experiment...
12 posted on
01/10/2006 6:27:35 PM PST by
Turbopilot
(Nothing in the above post is or should be construed as legal research, analysis, or advice.)
To: PatrickHenry; b_sharp; neutrality; anguish; SeaLion; Fractal Trader; grjr21; bitt; KevinDavis; ...
There's been a flood of FReepers joining the FT ping list lately and it's quite likely that I've missed a few, especially if the request was posted on a thread instead of FReepmailed. So, I just wanted to mention that if anyone's requested to join and hasn't been added it's definitely just that I didn't see the request (it's happened a couple times that I know of). Please feel free to request again!
This public service announcement will run for about ten pings or until whenever I get bored posting it. :)
FutureTechPing! |
An emergent technologies list covering biomedical research, fusion power, nanotech, AI robotics, and other related fields. FReepmail to join or drop. |
|
|
|
13 posted on
01/10/2006 6:27:38 PM PST by
AntiGuv
(™)
To: PatrickHenry
The fact that Nature touched this one sparks my interest. Has to have a net gain before it's groundbreaking, though. Whoever pulls that one off will probably be remembered as one of the greatest scientists.
14 posted on
01/10/2006 6:28:11 PM PST by
mysterio
To: PatrickHenry
This one is a lot closer to reality than the Pons-Fleishman experiment. Still, it would be next to impossible to get more energy out than is put in because of the nature of the acoustic mechanism. It might produce some useful physics, perhaps a few papers, maybe a PhD sometime.
16 posted on
01/10/2006 6:31:56 PM PST by
RightWhale
(pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
To: PatrickHenry
'sonofusion"? "sonoluminescence"?
Sonovabitch! Here we go again!
18 posted on
01/10/2006 6:35:13 PM PST by
adorno
To: PatrickHenry; RightWhale
Perhaps the most amusing, and telling aspect of the heady
Pons-Fleishman days was that the proponents were reportedly
running their tests with no provision for shielding from any
likely radiation from the supposed reactions, whereas the
skeptics trying to duplicate were using shielding just in
case they were mistaken.
Had P-F been correct, we'd likely now have "too cheap to
meter" energy, and a bunch of dead champions of same.
To: PatrickHenry
[Blast a liquid with waves of ultrasound and tiny bubbles of gas are created, which release a burst of heat and light when they implode. The core of the bubble reaches 15,000° C]
This is not a rehash of that cold fusion baloney.
But creating localized very high temperatures is relatively easy to do if you only want to create microscopic amounts of fusion reactions. The difficult part is using the fusion to make significant amounts of heat in a controlled process that can be used to generate electricity.
23 posted on
01/10/2006 6:49:42 PM PST by
spinestein
(I donated to FreeRepublic because it's VALUABLE to me.)
To: PatrickHenry
If they do achieve fusion, an expected result would be an intense neutron radiation field (as well as gamma radiation).
The fusion reaction between two deuterium atoms is:
D + D yields Helium-3 plus a neutron and gamma radiation
29 posted on
01/10/2006 7:10:25 PM PST by
punster
To: PatrickHenry
I thought this thread was going to have something to do with intel chips inside Macs now.
38 posted on
01/10/2006 8:51:46 PM PST by
1L
To: PatrickHenry
It's already been invented...I've seen it!
51 posted on
01/11/2006 11:12:27 AM PST by
RockinRight
(The Republicans Suck Less than the Democrats)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson