Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: calex59
You are MISTAKEN. Arnold followed the law exactly. Never trust the lazy, corrupt, stupid, vindictive MSM. Arnold's bike had a sidecar which, as a three-wheel not two, has an exception to the requirement for motorcycle endorsement.

He was legally licensed to operate this sidecar-equipped bike in CA on his driver's license.

60 posted on 01/11/2006 3:39:14 AM PST by newzjunkey (In 2006: Halt W's illegals' amnesty. Get GOP elected statewide in CA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: newzjunkey

Yes, you are correct, I forgot about the 3 wheeled vehicle law, which makes Arnold legal to drive in this case. I fell for the old lie about anything MSM trick, I can't believe I did that! I stil think the motorcycle license law is BS and needs to be repealed, it is only used to increase revenue, fat chance of ever getting it repealed though.


72 posted on 01/11/2006 9:15:08 AM PST by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson