Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I still do not know why he voted against drilling in ANWR.

I hope he does not expect to get re-elected.

1 posted on 01/10/2006 8:17:50 AM PST by arjay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: arjay

Weasley little enviro-weenie Mike DeWine.


2 posted on 01/10/2006 8:19:18 AM PST by NeoCaveman (Alitists for Alito)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: arjay

DeWine was given a chance ot go to ANWR and see first hand the drilling techniques and meet the people who live there nad those who would work there. He didn't go. Ask him why.


3 posted on 01/10/2006 8:21:35 AM PST by brothers4thID (Being lectured by Ted Kennedy on ethics is not unlike being lectured on dating protocol by Ted Bundy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: arjay
what a whiny c**t.
4 posted on 01/10/2006 8:23:16 AM PST by Vaquero ("An armed society is a polite society" Robert Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: arjay

Is there a reason in that response?


5 posted on 01/10/2006 8:23:43 AM PST by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: arjay
I still do not know why he voted against drilling in ANWR.

To keep "surplus" oil off the market.
Gotta keep those gasoline prices pumped up, ya know.
It hurts the Dow Jomes Average if Big Oil can't gouge your pocketbook.

6 posted on 01/10/2006 8:26:45 AM PST by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: arjay

De Wine is garbage. The whole OH GOP are backstabbers.


7 posted on 01/10/2006 8:32:06 AM PST by KC_Conspirator (This space outsourced to India)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: arjay
I thought the risks outweighed the potential benefits.

What risks?

Alaskans are tough people.....they decide to live there.

As for the land......nature is just as tough.

8 posted on 01/10/2006 8:36:40 AM PST by CROSSHIGHWAYMAN (expell the fat arrogant carcasses of Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: arjay
The DOE estimates that the ANWR would reach full production by the year 2020, and even then, it would only decrease our dependence on foreign oil by about 2%.

Ask him to name a single place in the world of similiar size that could provide more.

9 posted on 01/10/2006 8:40:03 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: arjay
In less fragile ecosystems, oil and gas exploration can coexist with the natural environment

Ask him to explain how in similar ecosystem 50 miles to the west in Prudhoe Bay, the caribou population has increased approximately 10 times in the last 30 years of oilfield development.

10 posted on 01/10/2006 8:42:42 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: arjay

At least DeRINO sent you a response mentioning ANWR. His letter back to me re: ANWR thanked me for my interest in social security reform! Please, God, let a REAL conservative run against this lying weasel in the primaries!


12 posted on 01/10/2006 9:05:56 AM PST by Polyxene (For where God built a church, there the Devil would also build a chapel - Martin Luther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: arjay
I think he is in the coal lobby because of all the reserves in Ohio.There is no good reason for not using our own resources to reduce our dependence on foriegn sources.Go to ANWR.org for all things ANWR.
14 posted on 04/10/2006 8:17:58 AM PDT by Gill (Gill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson