To: A. Pole
He says US consumers will save $2.5 billion every year.
State economies would lose at least $10 billion, which is a chunk of change if you are a small state like Montana or North Dakota. That is a net loss to the economy.
Please note that the "free trader" cares only for consumers, citizens have no place in the "free trader" view of the world.
To: hedgetrimmer
State economies would lose $10 billion from what source?
96 posted on
01/11/2006 9:08:18 AM PST by
1rudeboy
To: hedgetrimmer
State economies would lose at least $10 billion, which is a chunk of change if you are a small state like Montana or North Dakota.You have a source? A source that's not EPI?
97 posted on
01/11/2006 9:09:06 AM PST by
Toddsterpatriot
(How much for the large slurpee?)
To: hedgetrimmer
Please note that the "free trader" cares only for consumers, citizens have no place in the "free trader" view of the world. Any luck on finding a citizen who isn't also a consumer?
111 posted on
01/11/2006 9:46:24 AM PST by
Mase
To: hedgetrimmer
State economies would lose at least $10 billion, which is a chunk of change if you are a small state like Montana or North Dakota.Hey sweetie, any luck finding a source for your ridiculous claim? Or were you delusional?
124 posted on
01/11/2006 6:37:15 PM PST by
Toddsterpatriot
(How much for the large slurpee?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson