It's no wonder there is name calling from both sides -- we oppose "free trade" with the Chi-coms and, apparently, you guys and many more favor it as best I can tell.
We have free tradiin' corporations handing off technology, wealth, and production to the Chi-coms -- the very same Chi-coms who are handing off conventional and nuclear weapons capabilities to Iran -- the very same Iran who today supplies weapons and training to kill American military in Iraq -- the very same Iran whose leaders speak daily of using the nuclear weapons they are developing to kill Jews and Christians by the millions.
If anyone thinks that true free market capitalism is going to win out in Red China -- that is, if anyone thinks that the Communist ideologues are going to let the Chinese invisible hand slap them silly -- those people who think that Red China will evolve into free, capitalist China are nuts. IMO.
If anyone thinks that true free market capitalism is going to win out in Red China -- that is, if anyone thinks that the Communist ideologues are going to let the Chinese invisible hand slap them silly -- those people who think that Red China will evolve into free, capitalist China are nuts. IMO.Well, I guess we'll have to see. Is China a threat, sure. How do they compare to the threat of the Soviet Union?
Plenty of name-calling on all sides. But in this particular case, someone was called a "socialist" and the person doing the name-calling didn't have the decency to even acknowledge that it was happening. Instead, the person to whom the insult was directed got some meaningless blather about how it was a "correction" of one of my comments. Too bad A+Bert is no longer around . . . the subsequent exchange would have been truly entertaining.