Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MadIvan
"Taxation without representation" was one of the main causes of the American Revolution, but it was not the only one. Trade restrictions imposed by England was also a factor in the rising discontent among the colonies.

The American Revolution -- Customs Service Reform

The American Revolution
Customs Service Reform
The Grenville Program

Following the conclusion of the Seven Years’ War, British officials had the opportunity to assess the functioning of North America as part of the emerging empire. Their findings were startling and begged for massive reform. American merchants had traded openly with the enemy during the conflict and smuggling appeared to be the rule rather than the exception. The welfare of the empire was playing second fiddle to local interests, particularly in the New England colonies. Further, the customs service — the royal agency charged with responsibility for collecting duties — was woefully inept. The cost of running the customs bureaucracy far exceeded its collections.

George Grenville

George Grenville, a leading financial expert of the time, became prime minister in the fall of 1763. In an effort to bring some order to the chaotic functioning of the customs service, he instituted the following reforms:

Most American colonists understood that Parliament had the right and the duty to enforce laws regulating trade. However, many merchants felt that some of the legislation was unfair, subordinating their needs for profit to the maneuverings of more influential businessmen in England. The reform of the customs service, coupled with other Grenville programs, began to raise concerns among American about the lessening of their rights as Englishmen.


See chronology of the American Revolution.


The lopsided trade agreements that are being demanded by "Free Traitors" today are strikingly similar to those demanded by the British merchants of those years.

173 posted on 01/12/2006 7:06:47 PM PST by meadsjn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]


To: meadsjn

Nonsense. Preferential trade is a protectionist idea...what these arrangements were objecting to was Americans "trading with the enemy" - e.g., there was too much free trade.

Try again.

Ivan


178 posted on 01/12/2006 11:20:42 PM PST by MadIvan (You underestimate the power of the Dark Side - http://www.sithorder.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson