To: atlaw
The argument itself serves the interests of the left and those here pretending to be conservative. (Sort of like that Korean hero-cloner claimed to be a scientists while making a fool of the whole world.) That makes the issue less relevant than the agenda.
There are sincere evo-fanatics, of course, crankish bores are everywhere. And then there are their directors and users who see this sidebar as a way to make the pridefully-intellectual feel rather embarassed about their religious allies. Be alert to any mention of a vulnerable GOP pol in a blue state. Santorum is one they're after--keep yer ears on.
43 posted on
01/10/2006 8:33:09 AM PST by
Mamzelle
To: Mamzelle
How does freedom of thought and liberty serve the interest of the left? It seems to me, religion with its tenets of absolute and unquestioning obedience to a central authority ("God") would mirror the left's desires more.
47 posted on
01/10/2006 8:36:18 AM PST by
Junior
(Identical fecal matter, alternate diurnal period)
To: Mamzelle
There are sincere evo-fanatics Is that a compliment or an insult?
48 posted on
01/10/2006 8:36:18 AM PST by
Coyoteman
(I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
To: Mamzelle
There are sincere evo-fanatics, of course, crankish bores are everywhere. Pick me!! PICK ME!!!! ;)
To: Mamzelle
// The argument itself serves the interests of the left and those here pretending to be conservative, this makes the issue less relevant than the agenda.//
This can be illustrated in these very threads Mamzelle. Look at how much time is actually spent on evo in the evo threads.
Then there is the need to juxtapose evo against 'creationism', and then convert 'creationists' into imbeciles with things they did not say such as "God did it, end of story" or angels push the planets around and such.
Wolf
186 posted on
01/10/2006 1:30:04 PM PST by
RunningWolf
(Vet US Army Air Cav 1975)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson