You mean the Santorum who was "troubled by court testimony that showed some board members were motivated by religion in adopting the (ID) policy"? That Santorum?
Doesn't matter to a Dem what Santorum said--the point I've been attempting to make is that the evo agenda does not come before the Dem agenda--the Dems are not going to let Santorum off the hook because he said something unfavorable about ID. They'll paint him anyway they can--"triangulate"--it is politics, not logic. Santorum is going to get it both ways--the Dems will still sic the evos on him. Watch and see.