[Do not dub me shapka broham]

Why does that weaselly-faced, craven schmuck Charles Schumer even make a pretense of objectivity during this process?

I just don't get it.

Does he think there's some sort of incipient backlash brewing back home?

That if he's forthright about his opinion-as Rush Limbaugh suggested-and goes out and declares that he refuses to vote for anyone but an avowed socialist, that it'll redound to his detriment?

That the GOP will nominate a sacrificial lamb that might get 20% of the vote next time, instead of merely 18%?

Is there some sort of arrangement with C-SPAN whereby he receives more air-time if he invents a posture of fairness, rather than being up front, and displaying the raging partisan lunatic that almost all of us know him to be?

Or is lying just such a compulsion for him that he can't avoid doing it, even when it's completely unnecessary?

[Cboldt]

Why does that weaselly-faced, craven schmuck Charles Schumer even make a pretense of objectivity during this process?

I didn't notice the pretense ;-)