Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: saveliberty
Generous maternity plans were cut dramatically after this was passed in order to deal with the wider range of mandated issues.
It is unreasonable for an employer to be required to keep a job open for a year. That's painful, especially to a small business.

If any employer wants to bestow generous maternity plans on his/her employees that's their prerogative. I cannot believe that anyone with a modicum of common sense would think that this "trifling nanny-state directive" (as shapka put it) was be good for either families, employees, employers or the economy. It's destructive, feel-good legislation for the nanny staters in the Blue States which hopefully will secede from the union as quickly as possible.

2,562 posted on 01/10/2006 3:15:58 PM PST by N. Beaujon (http://www.nbeaujon.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1663 | View Replies ]


To: N. Beaujon

Oh I agree. The point I was trying to make is that once the government gets involved, it's really out of the question for an employer to be as generous.


2,853 posted on 01/10/2006 4:22:48 PM PST by saveliberty (Proud to be Head Snowflake and Bushbot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2562 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson