[nightdriver]

"Because the production of infants, their maturation and successful incorporation into society is essential to the perpetuation of a society, any society must give deference to restricting women from societal duties which interfere with the successful production of new members of the society."

Very true.

In America's case, the feminist tsunami has caused women to remove THEMSELVES from the naturally ordained role of perpetuating the population.

The same argument is made against allowing women into military combat. A woman is at least 100 times more "valuable" than a man is in the business of re-populating a society in case of war.

But that is another issue.

[Lucky Dog]

But that is another issue.

Actually, isn’t really another issue. It is “part and parcel” of the same issue.

In my rather long, previous rant, I had stated: “…the fact that militant feminists demand that requirement-justified and objectively verifiable, physical standards for some jobs be lowered or eliminated…” In my estimate, the majority of the career fields in military that feminists have demanded be opened to women are so opened at the expense of losing valuable capability in that career field or of unacceptably increase risk to the female occupants of those career fields and/or decreased unit morale, cohesion and effectiveness.

Unfortunately, the proverbial “train has already left the station” on this issue. Consequently, I fear that there will eventually be a terrible price paid in both “blood and treasure” for this asinine bit of politically correct, militant feminism.