Replies

There is nothing insensitive about it. It is pungent enough to get the point across, direct, to the point, and calls a spade a spade. It is also true, and reflects an entirely conservative blunt truthfulness about human nature. None of us should have to put up with the PC nonsense of offense-mongering harridans deliberately trying to be offended wherever possible. To heck with them. No rational discussion of social mores are possible if we are all supposed to pretend that everyone wants to marry unattractive 45 year old single moms, to avoid offending absurd pieties. It is a subject fit for a play by Aristophanes, and those who objected to it were simply out of line.

As for foreign brides, my boat has nothing to do with it, I'm not interested either way. But American men who find loving wives that way are to be congratulated on finding someone, and wished the best. And that is helps undermine feminism here at home is to be warmly applauded - as indeed it was warmly applauded by several posters. Feminists are offended by it both because it shows them up as undesireable and unwanted, and because the desire clearly stems from the "feminism differential" between typical US women and typical women from more traditional societies. And they can just go jump in the ocean. Nobody needs their approval, or wants it. American men can do as they jolly well please in the matter, they are not the property of feminist ideologues.

As for the idea that they are not a threat, I disagree. I repeat my mantra and I will repeat until I am blue or every conservative on FR knows it, and understands in human terms what it means. 1/4 don't see the light, 1/3 don't have a father, 1/2 watch him leave.

That means, for every conception in American, a quarter of them end in deliberate abortion before being brought to term. Of all children born in America, a third are illegitimate. Of all those children born to two married parent, half see their parents split in divorce before reaching their 18th birthday. This is a human tragedy of epic proportions. In 1950, none of it was true. This is not a small matter to just be laughed off.

There is nothing insensitive about it. It is pungent enough to get the point across, direct, to the point, and calls a spade a spade.

So do you think a woman like Terry Schiavo had a "shelf life"? Do you think a woman who has devoted most of her productive years to husband and child and suddenly finds herself on her own again to have outlived her "shelf life"?

I think you talk because you like to hear your own voice, not because you've given this any real spirit to your thought. Nor do I think you have much life experience to back your assertions up. If you are upset because you do not have a significant other that fits your excessively high standards, I dont wonder why considering this last post. No one wants to spend much time with an 'all or nothing' approach to life. God has belly laughs over people like you. Loud, long belly laughs.

Your strategy for dealing with the feminazis SUCKS, to put it simply, and others on this thread have been trying to tell you that. The negative loop you have created for yourself in your pseudo-philosophical rants has done nothing to solve the problem, and especially has done nothing to gain you allies.