Posted on 01/10/2006 1:49:22 AM PST by nickcarraway
Sushi Das is a columnist and feature writer for The Age, where she has been for 10 years in various roles including Victorian news editor, transport editor, letters editor and state politics reporter.
Also the fact that intersexual relations are dictated by deeply engrained behaviours based on evolution of the human race, is also ignored by feminists.
The fact is that men and women need each other and are incomplete without each other.
Materialism, the objectifying of men, has lead to a disolution of the family. Men do not need to live with materialistic , selfish women. Men just take what the want or can and move on. Men have become hunters and gathers in their relationships with women, rather than agrarian cultivators of single relationships
And now feminists complain?
Increasingly American men marry women from a traditional society such as Japan, Korea or Saudi Arabia. Perhaps there is a message there.
Carrot, I'm telling you that the next 20 years, it will the be women of India who reign in feminism, and bring semblance to this nuisance.
It's the free market at work!
The author of this piece is of Indian origin, atleast as far as the name 'Das' goes...
My response? I like my job, my house, and my car. I don't need a harassment suit. I think I'll keep my opions to myself.
I knew it was a woman who wrote this with out even looking at the name
Hey, she's kinda cute!!
Oops, was that sexist?? Probably a stoning offense at Berzerkly or Hahvahd. ;-)
www.mailorderbrides.com/
www.japanfriends.com
http://www.loveme.com/
http://www.romancium.com/
The liberal, "feminists" have lost the day. They simply created an alternative market where good men are hard to find.
I'm sorry, first of all, I haven't a clue what point the author was making and secondly, I can't follow this thread at all....maybe it is a "guy thing"? LOL
BTW, you might want to examine the finer details of IMBRA. It is designed to counteract marriage agencies.
Just because I know at about 10x as many decent women who were or are married to jerks as decent men who were or are married to jerks, does that make it so? Personally, I only know one sweet, decent man who is divorced because his wife is a jerk, but I'm sure they are many out there. The 3 remaining divorced men I know or work with are jerks, but that's just my experience. Conversely, I know at least 2 dozen women who have divorced their jerks--selfish men who cheated, lied, drank and many also stiffed their kids financially.
I wouldn't dream of painting all divorced men with the same brush. That would be stupid. I love men, but I don't love jerks.
As always, and will forever be, some men are jerks, some women are jerks. Jerks are mean and selfish, and that's why we call them jerks. If their spouses can afford to, they divorce the jerks. No one should have to live with a jerk.
And that's my theory on jerks.
She asked men to write in to engage in "debate" about "feminist issues," to "prove" their enlightenment. It didn't go very well; one general theme was that men felt they couldn't honestly engage on the issue without the PC police hauling them in.
She showed her commitment to honest discourse by mocking the responses and responders. She then ponders why men aren't winning to participate in a process they consider to be rigged, and concludes they should be "men" and stand up to it.
She makes the point she's trying to refute...if men decide they don't want to engage in intellectual slap fights with feminists, there's nothing she can do to stop them.
Funny she says that, because that's the way she describes the responses she received are exact mirrors of how the majority of individuals (men who haven't been turned into eunuchs by PC-ism and women who enjoy being women) see feminists' rantings.
The Phantom FReeper's definition of a feminist: a woman who's bitter about not having her "needs" met, even though her poor attitude is generally the cause of the problem (and I'm female, so no one better call me a chauvinist).
Me; I love the Women's Movement... especially when I'm walking behind them.
Well the "men" they asked must be the Woody Allen type, wormy, whining, effeminate wimps.
Who cares if a feminist howles you down, I barely note they exist and allow them to howl like alley cats until they look like complete fools. One of my favorite responses to feminists is "Thats cool for you, I just need a old fashioned girl, but good luck with your deal too" talk about infuriating.
Victims? Victims? Victims of what? That certain women wouldn't allow them to be men? Thats not the womens choice. There are plenty of women who want real take charge men, you just better know you have one when you get married.
Men who worry about what women want tend to end up looking like complete wimps. Not only are women confused about what they want, so generally are men.
The problem with feminism is that these girls party through college, get a job and spend 5 or 6 years moving up the ladder or accumulating stuff while going to bars to meet people. Usually by the time a girl hits her 30's the career is not as cool as they thought it would be and most of the men are married.
Men can be 40 and marry girls from 20 to 50 women who are 35 to 40 have a much smaller group to choose from.
America has the most unhappy women on earth while they are the most affluent and spoiled.
The common sense advice is "don't talk to them."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.