[PatrickHenry]

Only an activist judge would feel a need to offer up such a comment.

Taking Supreme Court precedents and the First Amendment seriously is pure conservatism. Tossing out precedent and the Constitution to please a gaggle of theocrats isn't any sane person's idea of what a conservative judge should do.

[connectthedots]

Taking Supreme Court precedents and the First Amendment seriously is pure conservatism.

Ignoring the clear language and intent of the drafters of the constitution, including the First Amendment is not 'pure conservatism'.