[Buggman]

Baloney. For one, chemical reactions are not strictly 'by accident'.

There is no chemical property that makes it more likely for DNA to just happen to line up in just such a way as to create a living cell, let alone for the DNA to just happen to be surrounded by exactly the right materials to interact with to create a cell from scratch.

For another, all the probability calculations I've seen and that I assume you are referring to, make some rather silly initial condition assumptions.

The "silly initial condition assumptions" are the ones required for the primordial soup creation myth.

I admire your faith. I don't have sufficient faith to believe in accidental abiogenesis. It's much easier to believe in God, especially after you've had some personal encounters with Him.

[Right Wing Professor]

There is no chemical property that makes it more likely for DNA to just happen to line up in just such a way as to create a living cell, let alone for the DNA to just happen to be surrounded by exactly the right materials to interact with to create a cell from scratch.

And if anyone actually believed any of that happened, you would have a point.

[b_sharp]

"There is no chemical property that makes it more likely for DNA to just happen to line up in just such a way as to create a living cell, let alone for the DNA to just happen to be surrounded by exactly the right materials to interact with to create a cell from scratch.

This is one of those silly initial conditions I mentioned. Abiogenesis is just that, the development of what we would consider life from self replicating non-life. No mention of DNA as the initial molecule other than by creationists.