To: b_sharp; xzins
Am I correct in assuming you are using 'zero' to denote the nothingness before the BB? If so, how does 'eternal' fit in to it?There is no "before" the Big Bang since time itself started with the Big Bang.
348 posted on
01/09/2006 5:07:39 PM PST by
RadioAstronomer
(Senior member of Darwin Central)
To: RadioAstronomer; b_sharp; Alamo-Girl
There is always a before. Sequence is not bound by time. On the hypothetical spaceship leaving earth at the speed of light, the lives of the people on earth SEQUENTIALLY are completed before the lives of the people on the spaceship are completed.
Which came first ZERO or something?
368 posted on
01/09/2006 6:20:03 PM PST by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
To: RadioAstronomer
"There is no "before" the Big Bang since time itself started with the Big Bang. Why are are you telling the punch line before the joke is fully set up?
385 posted on
01/09/2006 6:59:15 PM PST by
b_sharp
(Science adjusts theories to fit evidence, creationism distorts evidence to fit the Bible.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson