who designed the designerNo problem at all.
Something has to have been eternal. We can choose to accept that ZERO is eternal or that SOMETHING is eternal.
But if we have ZERO being eternal, then we must accept that ZERO can give rise to something.
"Something has to have been eternal. "
Only problem with that is that proving something is 'eternal' is an impossibility.
Why?
"We can choose to accept that ZERO is eternal or that SOMETHING is eternal.
Am I correct in assuming you are using 'zero' to denote the nothingness before the BB? If so, how does 'eternal' fit in to it?