Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Antonello

The ramifications, quite simply, would be granting the judiciary the power to legislate and to amend the Constitution by judicial fiat.


262 posted on 01/09/2006 1:09:49 PM PST by puroresu (Conservatism is an observation; Liberalism is an ideology)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies ]


To: puroresu
The ramifications, quite simply, would be granting the judiciary the power to legislate and to amend the Constitution by judicial fiat.

How? By agreeing with the 14th Amendment that women qualify as U.S. citizens?

On the other hand, I will concede that at the time the 14th was passed, no one, not even white men, had a constitutional right to vote. And the 14th didn't even grant that right to men - it simply outlined penalties that diminished the states electorate power if men were disenfranchised.

Therefore, I concede the point that the 14th did not grant women the explicit right to vote, but I will stand by the opinion that by virtue of their inclusion as citizens, they should have enjoyed the same implied privileges vested in male citizens.

308 posted on 01/09/2006 2:40:34 PM PST by Antonello (Oh my God, don't shoot the banana!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson