This post you made contains nothing but creationist's dreams. It is not science, but a ridiculous attempt to distort science to a particular result. (Its not only wrong, but spectacularly wrong!)
Tell me, how many scientists who actually do radiocarbon dating have signed on to this?
the group met and delineated a five-year plan of research to explain the apparent disparity between conventional and biblical dates.
That's a laugh. Most biblical scholars don't even believe what you are peddling. Check out these links:
ReligiousTolerance.org Carbon-14 Dating (C-14): Beliefs of New-Earth Creationists
The American Scientific Affiliation: Science in Christian Perspective Radiometric Dating: A Christian Perspective by Dr. Roger C. Wiens.
This site, BiblicalChronologist.org has a series of good articles on radiocarbon dating.
How does the radiocarbon dating method work? (The Biblical Chronologist, Vol. 5, No. 1)
How precise is radiocarbon dating?
Is radiocarbon dating based on assumptions?
Has radiocarbon dating been invalidated by unreasonable results?
<<<<
Son, I know a bit about radiocarbon dating.
>>>
Yes father, I think you do. But I think there are other people who also DO radio carbon dating who disagree with you. You may call them ignorant, thats fine with me. But I don't think you can dismiss their academic credentials so easily.
<<<<<<
This post you made contains nothing but creationist's dreams.
>>>>>>
Maybe we can replace dreams with challenges.
<<<<<<<<
It is not science, but a ridiculous attempt to distort science to a particular result. (Its not only wrong, but spectacularly wrong!)
>>>>>>>>>
Very nice attack. But the devil is in the details.
<<<<<
Tell me, how many scientists who actually do radiocarbon dating have signed on to this?
>>>>
1) How many scientists during Galileo's time actually supported him ? ANSWER : A MINORITY
2) How many scientists during Jenner's time believed him ?
Since we are into links, might as well provide some to balance the ones you provided :
Evidence from the Gulf of Mexico to examine various approaches to stratigraphy within the creation model.
http://www.trueorigin.org/cfjrgulf.asp
Geology and the Age of the Earth
http://www.trueorigin.org/walkergeo01.asp
Examining the credibility of the much-publicized “geologic column” (and why it always seems to look bigger in print!).
http://www.trueorigin.org/geocolumn.asp
Examining the facts behind radiometric (& other) dating methods cited by evolutionists to “prove” their million-year scenarios.
http://www.trueorigin.org/dating.asp
Examining the documentations provided by National Geographic regarding radio carbon dating.
http://www.trueorigin.org/natgeo_jw01.asp
Examining the science behind the claims of a very old earth using carbon dating techniques
http://www.trueorigin.org/old_earth_evo_heart.asp