[68skylark]

Who but far-out liberals would object to an attack on Fidel Castro? Or, more recently, Hugo Chavez? What about Kim Jong Il, of Korea? Surely he is a greater threat to the United States than Saddam. Or the Muslim Arabs in Khartoum who have been practicing genocide against black Christians in southern Sudan and black Muslims in Darfur? Or the Shiite Grand Ayatollahs in Iran? Or the shifty Syrians who have been stirring up trouble for 30 years?

Greeley is actually making some sense here -- if he wants us to think out regime change in some of these countries, I'm with him. I vote for going after North Korea, or maybe Iran, or maybe Syria. Cuba would be fine with me also.

I don't know if he's really advocating an attack on one of these countries, but if he is that sounds good to me.

[Cheburashka]

I don't know if he's really advocating an attack on one of these countries, but if he is that sounds good to me.
---
Don't worry, he's just fulminating.
He has a deadline, he has to turn in a column. Once he's got enough words down on paper he's done.
And if he accidentally appears to support some course of action that he will condemn if it is actually carried out, well hopefully most of his readers won't notice.