All they want to do is get a damaging point of view out 'there' and once the pot is boiling, they move on - you are quite right.
However do pass these along:
(Jimmy Carter)
(Bill Clinton)
The above are Executive Orders giving those presidents carte blanche - and because they are Democrats nary a word was raised - all concern was squelched.
In the absence of any complaints or evidence of damage or abuse from this, I find objections highly hypothetical.
The existence of those EO's isn't a useful point of argument. The EO's merely recapitulate the statutory language of FISA.