Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lawdude

I thought all applelate court decisions were published. No?


884 posted on 01/08/2006 4:47:32 PM PST by Morgan in Denver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 878 | View Replies ]


To: Morgan in Denver

"I thought all applelate court decisions were published. No?"

I don't do appellate work, but I don't think so. I could be wrong.


908 posted on 01/08/2006 5:10:25 PM PST by lawdude (LIEberals/socialists make up facts and history as they go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 884 | View Replies ]

To: Morgan in Denver
I thought all applelate court decisions were published. No?

No. Not all are published, but all are written. Google ...

appellate court unpublished opinions

... and you'll get a number of examples, e.g., http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/opinions/

The substantive difference is that unpublished opinions aren't persuasive in future legal cases, and should not be cited as providing or applying a certain point of law. That may change in the future

Judicial Conference Supports Citing Unpublished Opinions
Tony Mauro | Legal Times | 09-21-2005

The policy-making body of the federal judiciary on Tuesday endorsed a sweeping rule change that will allow lawyers to cite unpublished opinions in federal appeals courts nationwide beginning in 2007.

http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1127207112718

I suspect, but don't know for a fact, that some opinions are unpublished due to state secrecy.
932 posted on 01/09/2006 2:52:12 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 884 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson