Just out of sheer curiosity, what point are you trying to make?
Another sore spot. Matthews has been scrolling the names of House and Senate members who have "returned" tainted money from Abramhoff - but it seems that all the names are Reps, and only a solitary Dem here or there happens to make it. I suppose he can say that that's because so many Dems, eg. Harry Reid, have NOT returned the money!
Regardless, however one defines "fair and balanced" and irrespective of whether one thinks Fox qualifies, what is clear is that Matthews is a poster child of the opposite: unfair, unbalanced to the point of unhinged.