Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CarolinaGuitarman
"As I said, Hitler's was a perverted form of religion and of Christianity."

Then how about doing a bit of retracting yourself and stop associating Hitler with Christianity.


"Except... it (the race concept) was started by people who believed in creationism. Everything you don't like sounds like evolution to you. :)"

Ha given what is scientifically known about genetics, creationists whether they realize it or not do subscribe to a form of evolution. There is no recorded miracles that inserted different genes to result in what many creationists claim happened.


"No, he really didn't. You don't understand what natural selection is, so you equate it with whatever you think is wrong."

I understand better than you thing what is called 'natural' selection. Problem is that the natural dies and rots hardly something to get to entrenched in.


"Citations please, or retract.

"There is no lack of arrogance by the evolutionists maintaining their preferred environment."

Or of creationists inventing their own little fantasy worlds. :)"


Guess you missed that evolutionary post, I am not going to spend the time finding it but I will promise the next time I see a similar or exact response posted to give you a ping.
97 posted on 01/09/2006 6:46:54 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]


To: Just mythoughts
" Then how about doing a bit of retracting yourself and stop associating Hitler with Christianity."

Because he used a perverted form of Christianity. He associated himself with it; to deny that would be to lie. I have made it clear that he didn't speak for 99% of Christians. I will retract nothing. There is no evidence Hitler was an atheist.

"Ha given what is scientifically known about genetics, creationists whether they realize it or not do subscribe to a form of evolution. There is no recorded miracles that inserted different genes to result in what many creationists claim happened."

How is this a refutation of my statement that it was pre-Darwinians, and creationist ones to boot, who developed the concept of race? Why must you always ignore the question and change the subject?

"I understand better than you thing what is called 'natural' selection. Problem is that the natural dies and rots hardly something to get to entrenched in."

You prove my point; you haven't a clue as to what natural selection is, yet you feel obligated to keep communicating your ignorance to the world.

"Guess you missed that evolutionary post, I am not going to spend the time finding it but I will promise the next time I see a similar or exact response posted to give you a ping."

In other words, no citations. :)
103 posted on 01/09/2006 6:56:26 AM PST by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is grandeur in this view of life...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson