"It isn't a "non-answer." You really don't seem to understand the implications of your statements. Or perhaps you do."
Sure it's a non-answer. This one you sent is another. I understand the implications of what I wrote; why don't you actually say something and tell me what YOU think they are.
Either you don't understand the implications of what you wrote, or you do. Either way, you come out looking bad.
why don't you actually say something and tell me what YOU think they are.
Hmmmmm. Let's see. You continue to harp on the idea that Hitler was a theist. You've been reminded many times that Hitler was insane (on which point you parse in a most Clintonian manner), and that his views cannot be taken as representative of theistic thought.
And yet you continue to harp on this. I think you're tarring theistic thought in general on the basis of your belief that Hitler was theistic.
To get a better idea of his views, let's post again the quote from Mein Kampf, which perhaps you missed:
"Man must not fall into the error of thinking that he was ever meant to become lord and master of Nature. A lopsided education has helped to encourage that illusion. Man must realize that a fundamental law of necessity reigns throughout the whole realm of Nature and that his existence is subject to the law of eternal struggle and strife. He will then feel that there cannot be a separate law for mankind in a world in which planets and suns follow their orbits, where moons and planets trace their destined paths, where the strong are always the masters of the weak and where those subject to such laws must obey them or be destroyed. Man must also submit to the eternal principles of this supreme wisdom. He may try to understand them but he can never free himself from their sway." -- Adolf Hitler
This was probably the sanest statement of his worldview -- written before his quack doctor started shooting him full of crap. No theism here, but a pretty good summary of Nazism in practice, and it's pretty Darwinian.